ࡱ> hjg7 ҂bjbjUU &7|7|~l& 4&K$ ! 8 Z) y&d  0KrFULTON COUNTY COUNCIL July 20, 2004, 6:30 P.M., E.S.T., in the Assembly Room of the Fulton County Office Building. Meeting Called To Order: Council Members present at this meeting were Judy DeVries, Earl Gaerte, Christopher Sailors, Harry Richter, James Widman and Gary Sriver; also, County Auditor Denise J. Bonnell. Vice President Dave Helt was absent. President Christopher Sailors called this July 20th Meeting to Order asking all to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. Council Minutes: Chris referred to the minutes of June 7th, 2004, Joint Meeting with the Commissioners and also the minutes of June 22nd, 2004, which was the regular Council Meeting. The minutes of June 7th were reviewed; Judy DeVries made a motion to approve the minutes as presented of the June 7th, 2004 meeting. Jim Widman seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. The minutes of June 22nd were reviewed; Harry Richter made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 22nd, 2004 as corrected. Earl Gaerte seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. Sheriffs Department: Sheriff Roy Calvert explained that last night he made some transfers from the Sheriffs Sr. Deputy, which were combined lined items that needed to be changed around as they were caught during the Audit of the State Board of Accounts. The Sheriff went on to explain and he discussed the telephone maintenance equipment at the same time so that amount was transferred into maintenance instead of the account it was in. Sheriff Roy said at the August Meeting he would be seeking some additional money in the way of supplies for the inmates; bedding, mats and food because the budget was not made for fifty inmates. The Sheriff said this same thing happened when the contract was budgeted for the medical it was figured at $52,000.00; therefore, there will be a need for additional money in the medical. The Sheriff said he was asking for an increase in fees for Work Relief from $10.00 to $15.00, which requires the Commissioners to write a Co-Pay Work Release Ordinance, this was discussed and noted the Council does this. The Sheriff said then he should inform the Council that they have never charged a fee for notarizing documents at any time; therefore, if the Council would like there could be a fee established for that service, this was discussed as sheriff stated this has been considered in the past as a public service. The Sheriff referred to his monthly report, for June 2004, which he submitted; also, the claims that were submitted, if there were questions? There was a question as to how the locks were coming along; the Sheriff said they are being worked on a daily bases. This was discussed. There was a question on the medical care for the inmates, are they now charged? He said, yes they are charged and quoted it now costs them $10.00/per visit to see the doctor and he felt it should be raised to $15.00/visit and also keep the same on the prescriptions at $5.00 co-pay. This was discussed. Chris read according to the State outline there could be a maximum charge of $15.00 for medical, dental, eye or any other health care related service. Chris continued to read stipulations according to the State. This was discussed and noted there has been a savings over last year. Chris told Sheriff Calvert that he would contact Ted Waggoner regarding the Ordinances and get back with him. The question on charging a Notary Fee was discussed. Roy felt it was more worthwhile to charge for fingerprinting, this was discussed. Public Defender: Administrator Karin L. Fowler referenced the Appropriation Request in the total amount of $20,418.90, with a detail of the invoices; she stated these cover the 4th quarter, 1st and 2nd quarter that she was not able to pay out of the budget for this year. She continued to explain this. This was discussed; also the reimbursements that comes back, which were running about three quarters of the year behind. The discussion continued and Karin explained. She stated she has not received any additional bills at this time. Karen told the Council that the Courts are getting better about assigning fees; also, better about the deadline. Karin said for the year 2004 the courts ordered $12, 250.00 to be paid for 2003. The discussion continued. Chris called for a motion on this appropriation request. Gary Sriver made a motion to approve the Appropriation Request for the Public Defenders Office in the amount of $20,418.90, which comprises $19,536.70 for Conflict Attorneys Fees, $397.75 for Invest Exp Witness Trans and $484.45 for shortage of prior claims. Jim Widman seconded this motion. Judy asked where does this money come from. The answer was County General. Motion carried 6-0. Appropriation Request: Auditor: 101.191000-000-002 Extra Help $ 5,000.00 Chris explained that this additional appropriation came out of the State Board of Accounts Annual Audit; also, that it was a Federal Audit, because of the County receiving funds from Grant Funds, i.e., Aviation. Chris explained GASB-34 a new law passed by the Federal Government, which has to do with inventory that he explained, noting its a rather large requirement to get this in compliance by years end. Earl Gaerte made a motion to approve this request. Harry Richter seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. Historical Society: Commissioners 101.38300-000-068 Amount budget was cut $ 1,000.00 Chris read the explanation. This was discussed as to coming from the Tourism Board, which it was noted at the beginning was to be used for such as this. It was also noted a report was needed from the Tourism Board as to their plans for the money collected. This was discussed and noted that the Tourism Board should reconsider this request form the Historical Society; or explain just why they turned the request down. The discussion continued noting this had been previously discussed as $5,000.00 that was to be cut from the Historical Society Budget and that the Tourism Board was to pick up that difference the same thing as to what was being given to the 4-H Group, those were the Councils intentions. Now suddenly it pops up again. The consensus of the Council was to find out just why they cannot do this. It was noted there is no need for the Tourism Board to carry that money over as they are generating money all the time, and that too was a consensus, as their budget would have an item to promote different things in the County; why would they not be able to do this? The discussion continued. Jim Widman made a motion to table the Historical Societys Additional Request of $1,000.00 until the Council has interviewed the Tourism Board. Gary Sriver seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. Highway Department: 702 MVH 702.22700.000.531 Bituminous $100,000.00 Superintendent Scott Tilden explained the paving project this covers. Judy DeVries made a motion to accept this Additional Request. Jim Widman seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. 706 LRS 706.23000.000.000 Bituminous $150,000.00 Superintendent Scott Tilden explained this would be used for the Chip and Seal project for the remainder of the year 2004. Earl Gaerte made a motion to accept this Additional Request. Harry Richter seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. Public Defender: 101.271.11029 Conflict Attorneys Fees $ 19,536.70 101.271.12043 Invest Exp Witness Trans 397.75 101.271.12043 (shortage on prior claims) ____484.45 $ 19,418.90 Note the discussion and action on this request was earlier in the meeting. Advisory Plan Commission: 101.11007. Administrator $ 15,000.00 101.19004 Overtime $ 4,000.00 Note the discussion and action on this request was later in this meeting. Transfer Request: Rochester Township Assessor: From 101.013.36000.000 Maintenance Equipment $ 1,150.00 To 101.013.31102.000 Mileage $ 300.00 101.013.19000.000 Extra Help $ 850.00 Chris read the detailed explanation on this request. Gary Sriver made a motion to approve this Transfer Request. Jim Widman seconded this motion. Motion carried 6-0. County Clerk: Clerk Karen Miller came with voter information and the meetings that she had attended. She said the States Voter Registration System they plan to have this in place by January 2006. She said at this time on the Countys Cost they have not been made aware of; however, she feels there will be some substantial costs in moving over to the State Wide Registration System. Karen said that Fulton County did participate in the Primary Handicap Accessibility Survey. Karen explained this and said they have received the information back on the Surveys; theyre some things to be changed, revised and updated prior to 2006. Karen stated again that the highway superintendent said that the three precincts they have difficulty with the paving situation for handicap accessibility; he will be addressing those definitely before 2006. Karen said those precincts would be Liberty (Fulton), Newcastle (Talma) and Richland (Historical Society). Karen continued to comment on other things they will be working on regarding the handicap situation to come into compliance in 2006. Karen stated that QUEST has been chosen as the vendor for State Wide Voter Registration System; they also, have done a Statewide Duplication and Elimination Project throughout the State. Karen stated the Clerks have been instructed they could perform the Elimination if they complied with all the Federal and State Laws. Karen said she checked into this and it is just not feasible, as the postage alone would cost approximately $6,000.00; also the postcards and printing, which she explained. Karen said this all had to be done before August 4th and everything must be done and it was just not a possibility. She continued to explain and said they will be very pressed for time to get everything done. She said this and more would continue into 2005, which she wanted the Council to be aware of. This was discussed and the costs involved. Plan Commissions: Director Casi Cramer presented an additional Appropriation Request in the amount of $19,000.00. Casi stated she had been before the Commissioners and discussed this request. Casi said basically there has always been a question as to whether or not it could be handled in house or hire a consultant to actually take, now the Town of Akrons Ordinance that they have already created, and Fulton Countys making sure they are in the same format, which she explained. Casi stated what she would like to do is take the Town of Akrons Ordinance and put it in Fulton Countys. Casi said to do that would take quite a bit of computer time and someone that knows how to work that computer program. Casi explained this is not in addition to the other work she would like to have done. Casi said her question was the same as to the Commissioners do you want to handle this in house, using Casi and her staff to handle it or would you rather hire a consultant. Casi stated the Council had the estimates, and she continued to explain. Casi stated the Commissioners decided they would rather handle this in house instead of going to a consultant. Casi stated what the Advisory Budget Committee helped her create and to propose is an appropriation that would help Casis Staff compensate for their overtime that will be happening. She went on to explain. Casi said the $15,000.00 for the Administrator (Casi) this year would also be accompanied with a $10,000.00 next year to finish out having all the boards, basically getting everything together, implementation and carried through the year, which total $25,000.00 for overtime for Casis position, which she explained. Casi stated she was asking for overtime for Administrative Secretary basically for the extra area meetings and extra minutes. Casi explained the meetings involved that both she and the secretary would be required to attend. The question was asked if the Town of Akron voted to join the County Plan Commission and if the City of Rochester decides to do that, why do we need to consolidate their Ordinances into ours. If they are joining our group they just wipe the slat clean of what they had and become a part of our group, why do we need to attend their meetings, etc? Casi said the Countys Ordinance right now isnt built to hold the Town of Akron or the City of Rochester. She explained and the discussion continued. It was noted with Akron already having their ordinance and plan to just bring that into the countys already existing plan would save a lot of money and time. It was also noted there would still have to be public hearings, input sessions and public meetings. The discussion continued. The question was asked if there was any interest at all in Fulton and Kewanna coming in to this comprehensive County Plan? Casi said when she asked there was no interest. She explained and the discussion continued. Casi explained the additional is just for the remainder of this year; also, next year there would be an additional $10,000.00 for Administrator the overtime would remain $4,000.00. Casi explain how this would be used. The question was asked if the Council finds they cannot support this can they just not fund the Area Plan Commission at all and if that was done they would have to stay with the Advisory Plan, if funding is not found, which funding is a key issue. Casi stated she was not sure because the Council funds the Plan Commissions budget, whether an Area Plan Commission comes in or not that would just be the Area Plan Commissions Budget. Casi said the Plan Commission whether its an Area or Advisory and it would basically be the Town of Akron and if the City did decide to come in they would all be underneath the $78,000.00 budget. The discussion continued Casi stated she knew the City as well as the Town of Akron are very curious to know what the Councils thoughts are as far the funding, everybody knows how tight the State and County are as far as funding; also, to hear the Councils thoughts as far as whether or not they should chip in or what? Chris said, its like any kind of account you feel your way along until you see how things work out. Comments continued and included comments on the costs of getting an ordinance changed. Its possible that is something the Area Board would have to handle; also, Casi stated that the City or Town of Akron could opt out at any time they wanted to. This was discussed. Judy asked where does the Council get the money to pay for this because we cut and cut to get this years budget passed; will the State Board of Accounts allow this to be funded? Chris said an earlier thought was that the rainy day fund could be used , but you cannot use it for wages for that so, the second thought was if there is none in County General we could possibly take a little out of the Special CAGIT Fund or possibly the Host Fee. Chris stated we have to deal with the Town of Akron now regardless of whether or not the City comes in. Chris commented perhaps since the City Council Members are present maybe we need to set down as prior to budget, have a Joint Meeting with the City Council, see what their thoughts are and know more than with just a casual conversation. Judy stated the Council had told all the Elected Officials and Department Heads that they would not approve any increases this year. This was considered extra ordinary, something special. Judy asks then we can take it from someplace other than County General? Chris stated he would think so. It was felt this was something that would be dealt with in August. Gary said he would make a motion that the Council appropriates the $19,000.00 that the Plan Commission is asking for to begin this process for the year 2004. It was noted to take it from another fund it would have to be advertised again. This was thoroughly discussed to be in compliance. In this discussion the question was asked the Council if they are willing to fund the Area Plan Commission and give the City of Rochester the same service as they are receiving now, thats the bottom line. If Rochester City decides to come in they need to be able to tell the people they are still going to get the same type of service as you are receiving now only the Countys going to be doing it instead of the City. This was discussed. It was noted one of the things they try to stay away from is spot zoning, making a special interest decision for a special person; plan for the future of the community rather reacting to what someone might want at a particular moment. This was discussed, the actual zone map plan. Discussion continued. It was noted that whatever is done Countywide as far as zoning it is going to benefit basically, economically everybody in the County. This was explained and noted that overall if some things can be stopped that have been going on over the last twenty years in the County it may be difficult because when you have zoning people assume that zoning means you are going in and clean up all the bad spots, which you cannot do because it has been grand fathered but if we can just stop some things that have been going on it will make a little more interesting and a better place to have a home and raise children. The lack of zoning has hurt this county, our growth, development, and the fact a lot of companies did not come in because there was no zoning and it certainly hurt. There was referenced a discussion earlier from the Council Members about the possibility of not being able to finance this; at this same time, a statement was made that it had been said if Rochester City came in they should share a larger percentage of the costs. What is the feeling of the Council as a whole on this issue; where do you stand on this? This was discussed. It was noted that the County could only increase their budget so much, if we are not able to fund it all maybe thats where we need to sit down with the Town of Akron and City of Rochester and say can we help fund this, if this is the consensus of everybody to go in that direction. It all depends on how much money we have to do this with when it comes budget time. It was noted that maybe Akron and Rochester could pay for their own BZAs. It was also asked if Akron and Rochester set up their own BZAs, which would be the right thing to do; would they want to employ their own lawyer rather than the Planning Commissions for various legal questions in regards to the BZA? It was noted the BZA does hire its own lawyer. This was discussed. Casi answered and explained these questions. A resident of Rochester spoke up stating there are enough people on the City Council present that want to get more information about this and also interested and the Council has the final say, but maybe they should wait until the Council goes through their budget process and see where they are as far as the funding. Then the Council could give definite answers as to whether or not they can fund it, as the City is not talking about it becoming affective until 2006. Casi was asked about the timeline on this project? She stated she would like to be up and running by October 2005; yes, with Ordinances in place and Advisory Boards that she explained and the discussion continued taking into consideration if Fulton and Kewanna decide to come in. Casi said she has to have her budget ready by Friday for the Council to review. The Council has to determine what funds can be used for this project. It was noted there would not be an increase in the levy. It was also noted that the part those coming in later could be held responsible for, is the fact that the plan was written and you chose not to come in four years ago, so if the plan has to be revised to accept you, then that is a cost that might be considered; but as far as the operation of the budget from year to year it doesnt seem right you should have to pay that twice. This seemed to be the consensus of several Council Members. The discussion continued. The question was asked if there was anything in this program by going to an Area Plan Commission in the Councils long term view that would produce anything that would help pay for this. An answer to this was the Council feels they have a much better handle on improvements to buildings in the outlying part of the county than we do what is around Rochester. It was explained if somebody built a building, it gets on the tax rolls then we would be creating a little more income for the County; also, the factor of a Safety value, which you cannot put a monetary value on, but the Planning Commission was very successful in winning a Supreme Court decision, which in the long run that was one of the basic factors of the Plan from the very beginning to promote the safety of the citizens of Fulton County. This was explained further. Now, the question was asked if the figure that was turned in for 2005 include Akron and Rochester coming in or just Akron? Casi asked if that was the Building Inspector, as two are listed if just Akron comes in it would be just one. There was a discussion of demolition monies and who handles it. Casi said her office has noting to do with demolition it is the Commissioners as they do all the condemning in the County. It was noted this should be looked at this like the way the Assessor is; there is a Rochester Township Assessor who has an office in this building but she only assesses Rochester City, which is Rochester Township, and the County is paying for that and you keep saying you have to pay double but we as county people pay for your assessor, right? It was noted the County pays for all the Assessors. This was discussed and efficiencies noted for the City to gain to come in and there would be no reason to come in if those efficiencies were not there, thats the goal. Again it is how much money we have to work with. The question was asked if there was a way this information could be given to Rochester City Council and the answer was yes, the Council will know by the end of August if they can or not. It was noted the Plan Commission Board meets on the second Monday of each month. It was noted that the Council Attorney, Ted Waggoner would need to furnish an Attorney Opinion Letter stating that Casi was indeed an exempt-employee (since she is at management level and paid salaried) and could be paid an hourly rate instead of time and a half for overtime. Also that this is strictly a temporary pay increase for the additional duties that will be required to get up and running and that the salary for this position will return to the previous level once completed. Chris said this Appropriation Request, taking it out of another fund, would have to be advertised again. This was discussed. Gary said he would make a motion to go ahead and approve appropriating the $19,000.00 as presented, which may or may not be used by the end of this year. Jim Widman seconded this motion. The question was asked again do we need to determine where the money is coming from. A question was asked are we changing the Salary Ordinance? The answer was it could be appropriated, but not spent. There being no further questions, the vote was taken. Motion carried 5 to 1 (Judy DeVries, nay). Rochester City Council Members attending this meeting were Bob Miller, Rob Lowe, Joy Holloway, Bob Ulerick, Carla Smith and Burns Becht. New Business: Chris referenced a copy provided to all members regarding the Four County Councils discussion on future tax dollars; also, a letter dated June 30th, from the Department of Local Government Finance involving the funding for the 2004 budget purposes. Chris said this is information for the Council that is forthcoming. Chris referenced a letter received from the Northern Indiana Community Foundation, which he read to the Council. Chris stated he had talked with the Auditor regarding Certification of Assessed Values on information received because of the reassessment. Chris said to get things back on track they have set some proposed deadlines for the local officials with respect to the Certification of Assessed Values. He said this would be for 2004 and 2005; Chris read as follows: Township Assessor to the County Assessor for Personal Property to be in June 1st; Real-estate deadline May 15th, County Assessor to the County Auditor by July 1st, and the same for the Real-estate and Personal Property both and the County Auditor to the taxing units and the Department of Local Government by August 1st. Chris said they stressed this is to get back on track. Chris said there was to be a meeting tomorrow evening, July 21st, at 7:00 p.m., at Aubbeenaubbee Township for anyone that can attend and Chris urged all to attend who could. There was short discussion. There was a feeling that there should be a short discussion of the issue in Leiters Ford of property that is adjacent to the Library coming up on a Sheriffs Sale. This was discussed and noted they have a Library Board, which is the Rochester Library Board and basically they do not have a representative on that board. This was discussed. The issue is that since last February they have been looking into some allegations on the Assessors Office and some funny numbers, fuzzy numbers whatever you want to call them on some assessing records on certain individuals. Jim stated he has since dug into that quite a bit deeper and he is finding that he is sure that there are fuzzy numbers on certain individuals as wants to be certain that there is not a system problem. He sees items that should be assessed for Commercial that are assessed for Residential on land values, depreciation on some buildings that are way more than they should be. He spoke of the Hardees Building across the street that has a total value of around $80,000.00, now common sense would tell you that cannot be right, in fact it is wrong, it does not take into consideration that the alley had been vacated many years ago and that should be added to that property. He stated he then started digging out more properties; the old Burger King Building roughly sixty grand, prime real estate and he is finding these issues on a lot of different properties. There are buildings on the assessing rolls that have been there for several years. He said there are roughly eleven thousand that have 911 addresses and if our reassessment was totally working correctly, they would only have to do eight assessments a day average to actually go through all those properties in a five year period. Now some of these couldnt have been looked at or the gross mistakes that he has seen wouldnt be there. Hes thinking there is so many millions of dollars of lost assessed value; he would hate to even guess at the true number, either that or there is just a few properties that is assessed way too high. He doesnt know what rest thinks we can do but he thinks as this job changes down there now that we address this issue, because this is a lot more serious than he ever thought it was. He thought at first it was just certain properties and one of them has been changed and it was increased, its public record, the actual house was increased by seven hundred fifty thousand dollars from where it was already assessed at. I dont understand how we could make that kind of a mistake but at the same time mistakes do happen and the systems do roll numbers; he really believes that we have maybe some issues with some software and he personally would like to address it in from that direction being as we are going to have a change in management in that area. He said if just twenty parcels were pulled and looked at how they are valued. The comment was the lake properties are totally valued differently. He said yes, and they are so totally below what they ought to be even after the reassessment. He said he has seen numbers he cannot believe that it is the assessed value of those properties. He stated it is possible the software when it rolls, every time they put in new it could roll to from commercial to residential, he explained. He feels there needs to be emphasizes put in this area because he is sure the levy could go up a little. The auditor stated to keep in mind on the values rolling, etc., when the assessor rolls the values to the auditor she provides the auditor with a report ahead of time that tells the auditor what her final figures are going to be. Denise said her job then is to make sure her computer system balances exactly with the assessor; therefore, they are not being lost when they roll to the auditor. This was discussed. He gave examples of properties that were updated in 1985 and all at once it reverts to 1972 values, why would this happen and he sees properties that dont even fit the schedule for land values on frontage value that doesnt fit the sheet that says what land values are going to be, its not even a possibility they could be right. He feels those kinds of things have to be computer generated, but we are paying someone to look at these and he cant believe that he would be so lucky as to pull properties and find ones that are screwed up, if he is using his as an example as what is correct; when the Hardees Building is paying $1800.00 a year and he is paying $2500.00/year for two acres, there is something wrong and he is not complaining his is too high, not at all, he feels something is wrong with the system. The question was asked if it isnt something wrong with the system where do you go from there. Jim asked what is the Councils jurisdiction? Gary felt that was something they should discuss with their Attorney Ted Waggoner. Jim felt they could ask, as the Council certainly must have some kind of overseeing responsibilities. Jim said he has heard all kinds of horror stories of things being changed and others have too. No explanations just changed. This discussion continued. Gary commented we need to get some legal opinion on this and where does the Council go and how to rectify this situation; as Councilman are constantly saying we are out of money, we dont have enough money to operate on what Jim has found, we have lost a lot of money over a number of years, which has made it miserable for the Council at budget time year after year. It was noted there is bickering between the Township Assessors office and the County Assessors office; one office says they are not suppose to do it and the other office says they just never get to it, the ones that we have actually hired to do the Rochester Township Area. There was a question to should the Council get the Commissioners to help. One was asked and was told they dont feel thats there responsibility, because she is an elected official. Chris said as an elected official they have responsibilities and if they are not filling their responsibilities, this was discussed. Harry stated he wanted to say about a year ago the REMC sent out a letter and said we are going to adjust your bill to the next highest dollar if you dont come and tell us you dont want to do that; being on the Community Foundation Board that has generated about fourteen thousand dollars. It was determined the only thing the Council can do is make sure that from now on the records are accurate; also, if the successor to this office is asked to do what should be done, she will have to have extra help. This was discussed and noted it is the Countys responsibility to assess the real estate. This was discussed. There was no further business; Chris called for a motion to adjourn. Judy DeVries made a motion to adjourn. Harry Richter seconded this motion. Motion passed 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. FULTON COUNTY COUNCIL _____________________________ Christopher Sailors, President ____________________________ Gary Sriver, Member _____________________________ Harry Richter, Member _____________________________ James Widman, Member _____________________________ Earl Gaerte, Member _____________________________ Judy DeVries, Member Attest:__________________________________ Denise J. Bonnell, Fulton County Auditor y 24%'(>V!a!w""##O*Q*|++ ````ccccccrdtddd҂>*H*5\7xyjk '(> a b u v $a$҂Jnouv~ !a!w!!!!"$a$","v"w""""""#@####+(,(|+}++c-d-6677HH,M-M$a$-MOO,[-[]]_~__` ``VaWaaadd|e}effȀ$a$Ȁ %&Hbcفځ@uvwx $p^p`a$$a$Ђт҂$a$$&P1h/ =!"#$% i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH <A@< Default Paragraph Font*>@* Title$a$5\,B@, Body Text$a$~  z z z z z z z z z z z @s,G;IXcs}~uxQ * " xyjk '(>abu v   Jnouv~ aw,vw@+$,$|'}''c)d)2233DD,I-IKK,W-WYY[~[[\ \\V]W]]]``|a}abb{{||||||| }%}&}H}b}c}}}}}}}}~~@~u~v~w~x~~~~~~~~~~000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000҂B"-MȀ҂CEFGHI҂D~~CharleneNC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of COUN072004.asdCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneC:\COMM\COUN072004.docCharleneA:\COUN072004.docFulton Co. AuditoreC:\Documents and Settings\auditor\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of COUN072004.asdFulton Co. AuditorA:\COUN072004.docMicrosoftWorksTaskIDho0@~~ o~~~@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial"h뇆BF7뇆lf 4 !Hr0d}~2FULTON COUNTY COUNCILCharleneFulton Co. AuditorOh+'0 $0 L X d p|FULTON COUNTY COUNCIL9ULT CharleneUNTharharNormaleFulton Co. AuditorI3ltMicrosoft Word 9.0I@))@r*u@0Xu@y lf՜.+,0 hp  Farm 674} FULTON COUNTY COUNCIL Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVXYZ[\]^`abcdefiRoot Entry Fp$d yk1TableKWordDocument&SummaryInformation(WDocumentSummaryInformation8_CompObjjObjectPoolp$d yp$d y  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q